Research & Proposal Development Services maintains a library of recent successful grant proposals and project overviews written by University of Nevada, Reno faculty. This library has been created to ...

Manage your time – Know the deadlines and plan ahead to obtain requirements like transcripts and recommendations. Follow directions carefully – Applications that are missing elements or submitted ...

Application and proposal requirements vary according to each sponsor’s requirements. Please review and follow all requirements to maximize your chance for success. A full proposal provides an in-depth ...

Remember to contact your Research Administrator using the McCormick Proposal Intake Form as soon as you plan on submitting a proposal so they can work with you to start the process. The Principal ...

The Research Development Office (RDO) maintains a partnership with TIG, a research development firm specializing in strategic positioning, proposal review and development, and team science. Proposal ...

The Materials Science and Engineering (MSE) PhD Qualifying Exam is intended to allow the candidate to demonstrate depth of understanding in his/her chosen area of research, and to demonstrate the ...

The Research & Innovation Office (RIO) provides proposal development services to help increase the competitiveness of grant proposals. Services can include writing, editing, proofreading and rigorous ...

Perhaps of greatest importance when you apply for an academic position is a description of your proposed research. Departments want to know what you will need to get results within the first three ...

The Earth Planetary and Space Sciences Institute (EPSSI) is and will continue to be a focus for interdisciplinary activities in earth, atmospheric, oceanographic and space sciences at Michigan ...

As part of the Office of Research and Technology Management, the Office of Research Administration requires all funding proposals be submitted at least three business days ahead of the sponsor’s ...

So your grant proposal came back with an unenthusiastic response from reviewers. Was it because they found your science lackluster? Maybe. But there’s a good chance the problem was important ...