The Supreme Court’s brisk opinion in Dahda v. United States awarded the government yet another exclusionary rule victory, this time in the context of a statutory provision rooted in the Omnibus Crime ...
For purposes of the exclusionary rule, HIPAA is no guide as to whether evidence was illegally obtained by law enforcement. It can only dictate whether protected health information was improperly used ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results